The Bihar State Food And Civil Supplies Limited v. Vidyanand Das @ Bidhyanand Das

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.689 of 2024 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2819 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

The Bihar State Food And Civil Supplies Limited Through Sri Vinay Kumar Son of not known, the Managing Director, Khadya Bhawan, R. Block, Daroga Prasad Rai Path, Road No. 2, Patna- 800001. 2.

Shri Amresh Kumar Amar, Son of not known, the General Manager (Administration) Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Khadya Bhawan, R.Block, Daroga Prasad Rai Path, Road No.2, Patna800001 3.

Sri Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, Son of not known, The Deputy General Manager(Administration), Accounts and Budget, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Khadya Bhawan, R.Block, Daroga Prasad Rai Path, Road No.2, Patna- 800001 4.

Shri Subhash Kumar, Son of not known, The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Munger, District- Munger. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

Vidyanand Das @ Bidhyanand Das Son of late Mukha Das, Resident of 462, MIrchi Talab, Dhobi tola, Lal Darwaja, P.S. Munger, District-Munger. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Anjani Kumar, AAG-3 Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 16-07-2024 Learned Additional Advocate General submits that there was never any submission made that the order passed by the Managing Director will be recalled and the retiral benefits paid. Hence, a review will be filed, especially since the writ petitioner was not entitled to any benefits by reason of the earlier title suit against the dismissal order having been

Patna High Court L.P.A No.689 of 2024(2) dt.16-07-2024 2/2 dismissed, which was not challenged in appeal and the writ petition filed against it also stood dismissed. These are not facts which were brought before the learned Single Judge and the learned AAG submits that a review will be filed and with that liberty, the L.P.A is sought to be withdrawn.

2. The L.P.A is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the liberty to file a review.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Anushka/- U