Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59085 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2021 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== PANKAJ KUMAR S/O Nand Kishore Singh Resident of Village - Noni, Police Station - Tikari, District - Gaya, and at Present Mohalla- Janakpur, Police Station - Muffasil, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tej Narayan Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-07-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 120B of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, two unknown miscreants, hired by the petitioner have fired upon the informant with a view to kill him. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59085 of 2021(2) dt.04-07-2022 2/2 leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The name of petitioner has been dragged in this case only on the basis of suspicion as there is several dispute between the petitioner and the informant. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence nor the petitioner was seen at the place of occurrence. Both parties have filed several cases against each other. Petitioner has four criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering that there is prior land and other disputes between the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No.220/21, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.