Golu Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50564 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-587 Year-2024 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna ====================================================== Golu Kumar Sinha Son of Sanjay Prasad Sinha @ Sanjay Kumar Resident of Ranipur Nichaligali Renter of Bhagwan Lal Rays House, P.S.- Mehandiganj, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 587 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the articles, mentioned in the written report, have been stolen from the flat of the informant by an unknown thief.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no specific allegation has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50564 of 2026(2) dt.17-07-2026 2/3 attributed against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR, but name of the petitioner has transpired in this case during investigation. It is further submitted that no any stolen article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2025 and has got ten criminal antecedents. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 13.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 71226 of 2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 587 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50564 of 2026(2) dt.17-07-2026 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive dates without sufficient cause.

(III) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence or the witnesses during the trial.

(IV) Petitioner shall not commit offence of similar nature in future.

If any of the above conditions are violated, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T