Dabar @ Md. Kayamudin v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51368 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-514 Year-2020 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Dabar @ Md. Kayamudin Son of Najamudin @ Md. Nejamudin Resident of Village- Halimpur, P.O.- Rajwara, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh No. I, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 514 of 2020, dated 01.10.2020, lodged under Sections 399, 402, 413 & 414 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against 11 named accused persons, including the present petitioner, with the allegation that all the accused persons were planning to commit dacoity and loot. When the police raided the place, five persons were arrested from the spot, while the remaining accused persons succeeded in fleeing away.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51368 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/2 further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Counsel also submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot and his name has been implicated in the present case solely on the basis of the confessional statement of a co-accused. Counsel further submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner but fairly submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, let the above-named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. IInd, West Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 514 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T