← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4874/2021allowed

Ramanuj Prasad @ Anuj Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-07Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4874 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-545 Year-2020 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

RAMANUJ PRASAD @ ANUJ PRASAD Son of Late Saryu Mahto Resident of Village- Dariyapur, P.S.- Islampur, District- Nalanda. 2.

Bharat Prasad Son of Late Saryu Mahto Resident of Village- Dariyapur, P.S.- Islampur, District- Nalanda.

3.

Rajiv Pandey Son of Baban Pandey ( Husband of Member of Ward No. 9). Resident of Village- Dariyapur, P.S.- Islampur, District- Nalanda. 4.

Satyam Patel @ Saurav Patel Son of Bharat Prasad (Elder Son of Bharat Prasad). Resident of Village- Dariyapur, P.S.- Islampur, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-12-2021 This application has been brought at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner through mentioning slip due to typographical error.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that on 17.12.2021, the order dated 07.12.2021 was modified, but in paragraph no. 2 of the order dated 17.12.2021, the name of petitioner no.2 Rajiv Pandey has wrongly been typed in place of petitioner no.2 Bharat Prasad.

In view of the above submission, in the second paragraph of the order dated 17.12.2021, let the words

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4874 of 2021(4) dt.23-12-2021 2/2 "petitioner no.2, Rajiv Pandey" be corrected to be read as "petitioner no. 2, Bharat Prasad."

Accordingly, the order dated 17.12.2021 is rectified to the extent above.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U T