← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1857/2024disposed

Kismisiya Devi v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Gov. Of Bihar

2025-04-28Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1857 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2023 Thana- NADI P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Kismisiya Devi W/o Late Lala Rai R/o Village- Jethuli, PS- Nadi, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Gov. of Bihar Patna 2.

The Director General of Police, Patna Bihar 3.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna Bihar 4.

The Sub-Divisional Deputy Superintendent of Police Patna City, Patna Bihar 5.

Officer-In-Charge, (S.H.O), Nade Police Station, Patna Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suraj Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S.C.18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-04-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. This application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for the following relief(s):

"i). For issuance of an appropriate writ/ writs, Order/Orders, direction/directions commanding and directing the Respondent concerned to proper investigation of Nadi P.S. case No.

269/2023 registered for the offence under section 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 448, 380, 307, 504, 506 along with section 27 of Arms Act by a independent Investigating Agency of the State.

II). For that directing the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1857 of 2024(2) dt.28-04-2025 2/2 Respondents to arrest the accused persons of Nadi P.S. case No. 269/2023 who were absconding and unnecessary torturing the petitioner for withdrawal of the aforesaid case. The accused persons also giving life threatening to the widow lady and her family members."

3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the investigation is not being conducted properly.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the police has not taken the statement of the petitioner.

5. This application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the I.O. and the Magistrate concerned for redressal of his grievances.

6. If the petitioner files such an application then the I.O. and the Magistrate will act on the application of the petitioner in accordance with law.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T