← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18717/2016withdrawn

Kripa Nath Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-06Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18717 of 2016 =========================================================== Kripa Nath Singh, Son of Late Shital Singh, Resident of village - Bahuan, P.S. Sonhan, District - Kaimur, at Present residing at Chakbandi Road, Front of Maa Gayatri Mandir, Ward No. 11, Bhabua, District - Kaimur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Education Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Bihar School Examination Board ( Higher Secondary ), Budh Marg, Patna

3. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board ( High Secondary ), Budh Marg, Patna

4. The District Teachers Emplacement Appellate, Authority, District Kaimur at Bhabua

5. The Governing Bady, through its Secretary, MRSD Patel Inter Mahila College Bhabua - 2

6. The Bijay Bahadur Singh, Son of Late Ranjeet Singh, resident of village - Isiya, P.S. Chainpur, District Kaimur ( Bhabua ), at Present Principal Incharge, MRSD Patel Inter Mahila College Bhabua - 2 .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhya Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ramchandra Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mrs. SHILPA SINGH-GA12 Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to GA-12 For BSEB : Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-12-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to prefer appeal against the impugned order.

Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

It is indicated that if any question of limitation arises before

Patna High Court CWJC No.18717 of 2016 dt.06-12-2017 2/2 the appellate authority, the authority shall keep in mind the fact that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this court by filing present application, while considering the petitioner's case for condonation of delay.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Vinita/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date12.12.2017 Transmission Date NA