Brijnandan Prasad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3453 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Brijnandan Prasad, Son of Late Doman Mahto, R/o Village- Jalalpur, P.O.+P.S.- Noor Sarai, Distt- Nalanda (Retired Assistant teacher) at present General Secretary of Middle School Jalalpur Noor Sarai Distt- Nalanda.

2. Sudhir Kumar, son of Sri Badri Narayan Singh, R/o Village- Prem Nagar P.O.- Damodarpur Valdha, P.S.- Nagar Nausa Distt- Nalanda at present posted as the Headmaster of Middle School Jalalpur Noor Sarai DisttNalanda.

3. Kumari Neelmani Sinha, Daughter of Brijnandan Prasad, R/o VillageJalalpur, P.O.+P.S.- Noor Sarai Distt- Nalanda at present posted is the Assistant Teacher of the Middle School Jalalpur Noor Sarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Director of Primary Education, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Patel, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadav-Gp23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 22-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Without going to the details of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in the light of the order dated 26.9.2016 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8245 of 2013 which reads as follows:- "This court is not giving any opinion on the merit of the case. This court only directs the petitioners to file detailed representation before the authority concerned and if the authority concerned

Patna High Court CWJC No.3453 of 2017 (3) dt.22-12-2017 2/2 arrives to a conclusion that this case is covered by the aforesaid judgment and the petitioner is entitled to relief in that circumstance they should be given the same benefit. The authority concerned is directed to dispose of the representation within a period of four months from the date of filing of the representation. With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ petition is disposed of." With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U