← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51716/2024allowed

Rohit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-02Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51716 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2024 Thana- DURGAWATI District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Rohit Singh S/O Ravindra Singh R/O Village- Bheriya, P.S- Durgawati, Distt.- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rana Bhupendra Narayan Singh Ms. Babita Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the allegation in the FIR, during night patrolling, police received a secret information about assembly of some antisocial persons beneath Over Bridge of N.H.-19, went to the place of occurrence and apprehended six accused persons including the petitioner and some of them successfully escaped. On search, arms were recovered from possession of Vikash Yadav and from this petitioner one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51716 of 2024(2) dt.02-08-2024 2/3 mobile phone and cash of Rs. 9,000/- were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. No any incriminating arms have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and also he has no concern with the same. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Similarly situated other accused person has already been enlarged on bail by another coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.7.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49432 of 2024. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 11.03.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that petitioner was arrested on spot by the police.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 63 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51716 of 2024(2) dt.02-08-2024 3/3 satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Kaimur at Bhabua.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U