← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49678/2022bail granted

Arun Kumar @ Arun Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-28Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49678 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2022 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== ARUN KUMAR @ ARUN MAHTO Son of Ramdaresh Mahto Resident of Village - Goha, Ward no.4, P.s.- Hasanpur, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Yogesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khodawandpur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 25.06.2022.

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there was recovery of 1170 litres of IMFL/country made liquor. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is a driver of alleged vehicle, from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49678 of 2022(2) dt.28-09-2022 2/2 where recovery of illicit liquor was made, having no knowledge to carry alleged illicit liquor. It is further submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent. It is also submitted that seizure list is not supported by independent witnesses. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case is complete, where charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tempering with the evidence. Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as seizure list is disputed and not supported by independent witnesses, where petitioner is a man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Khodawandpur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned I/c Exclusive Excise Judge-I, Begusarai/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) R.S.Sen/- U T