Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4639/2018bail granted

Sumer Sharma @ Sumeshar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-24Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4639 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -219 Year- 2014 Thana -CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- SARAN ====================================================== Sumer Sharma @ Sumeshar Sharma .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier thrice rejected vide order dated 2.3.2016,23.11.2016 and 26.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53495 of 2015, Cr. Misc. No. 47801 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 29934 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 24.10.2014 and up till now the trial has not been concluded, however, there was direction to conclude the same within four months and the petitioner was given liberty to renew the prayer of bail. No prosecution witness has been examined up till now and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that trial has not been concluded as yet.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4639 of 2018 (2) dt.24-01-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Saran, Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 219 of 2014 corresponding to S.Tr. No. 487 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) khushbu/- U T