Vishwanath Jha v. The Food Corporation Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.800 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1750 of 2017 ====================================================== Vishwanath Jha, age 71 (Male), Son of Ramakant Jha R/o- Alampur, P.S.- Vidayapati Nagar, Dist- Samastipur.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The Food Corporation Of India through its Senior Regional Manager having his office at Arunachal Building, 3rd Floor, Exhibition Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Distt-Patna 2.

The General Manager of Food Corporation of India at Arunachal Building, 3rd Floor, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Distt-Patna 3.

Assistant General Manager Food Corporation of India at Arunachal Building, 3rd Floor, Exhibition Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Distt-Patna 4.

The Distt. Manager Food Corporation of India Navratan Hata Purnia, Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar No1 Mr. Jitendra Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. P.K. Verma, Sr. Advocate Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 24-07-2025 Appellant has assailed the order of the learned Single Judge in not extending consequential benefits. Perusal of the learned Single Judge order dated 09.05.2019 passed in CWJC No. 1750 of 2017, the learned Single Judge has not set aside the compulsory retirement order so as to extend notional benefits. That apart, the appellant has not sought for quashing of the compulsory retirement order to seek further service and

Patna High Court L.P.A No.800 of 2019(8) dt.24-07-2025 2/2 consequential benefits like back wages.

2. In the absence of quashing of compulsory retirement punishment on account of appellant's conviction, the appellant is not entitled to any relief subsequent to 06.11.2001, the date on which he was retired compulsorily on account of conviction. Therefore, the appellant has not made out a case to interfere with the order of the learned single judge dated 09.05.2019 passed in CWJC No. 1750 of 2017. Accordingly, the present LPA No. 800 of 2019 stands disposed of, reserving liberty to file civil review petition in CWJC No. 1750 of 2017. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) GAURAV S./- U