← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5602/2021bail granted

Vikrama Ram @ Vikram Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-29Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5602 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

VIKRAMA RAM @ VIKRAM RAM SON OF LATE KESHAV RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SHIKARIYA (RAVIDAS TOLA), P.S. - DARIGAO, DIST. - ROHTAS 2.

BRIJ LAL RAM @ BRIJA LAL RAM SON OF SUKHARI RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SHIKARIYA (RAVIDAS TOLA), P.S. - DARIGAO, DIST. - ROHTAS 3.

RAJESH RAM SON OF SHIV NARAYAN RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SHIKARIYA (RAVIDAS TOLA), P.S. - DARIGAO, DIST. - ROHTAS 4.

RAMANAND RAM SON OF SHIV KUMAR RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SHIKARIYA (RAVIDAS TOLA), P.S. - DARIGAO, DIST. - ROHTAS 5.

DUGJEE RAM SON OF DURGA RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SHIKARIYA (RAVIDAS TOLA), P.S. - DARIGAO, DIST. - ROHTAS 6.

LAV KUSH RAM SON OF BRIJ LAL RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SHIKARIYA (RAVIDAS TOLA), P.S. - DARIGAO, DIST. - ROHTAS 7.

SANJAY RAM SON OF MUNI RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SHIKARIYA (RAVIDAS TOLA), P.S. - DARIGAO, DIST. - ROHTAS ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners are expected to honour their undertaking to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending his/their arrest in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5602 of 2021(2) dt.29-11-2021 2/3 connection with Sasaram Nagar (Darigo) P.S. Case No. 305/2020 for the offence registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution case in brief is that petitioners along with 8-10 accused persons came with weapons and assaulted the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the allegation of assault is against the three co-accused persons and not against these petitioners. It is further submitted that name of the petitioners have been included in the first information report to make pressure for withdrawing the earlier case filed by the petitioners against the informant and others. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of his/their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5602 of 2021(2) dt.29-11-2021 3/3 Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Sasaram Nagar (Darigao) P.S. Case No. 305 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Jagdish/- U T