Patna High CourtCWJC/17023/2016dismissed

Vinod Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-29Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17023 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Vinod Kumar Paswan S/o Late Ramnandan Paswan R/o village - Bhawanipur, P.O. Dighari, P.S. Suryagarha, District - Lakhisarai, At Present Posted as Headmaster, Up - Graded Middle School Wakarchak, District - Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, District Patna

2. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariate, District Patna

3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger Division, District Munger

4. The District Education Officer, District Lakhisarai

5. The District Programme officer (Establishment), District Lakhisarai

6. The Block Education officer, Block Suryagarha, District Lakhisarai

7. Anita Mandal W/o Surendra Mahto Resident of Bakarchak, P.O. Dighari, P.S. Suryagarha, District - Lakhisarai At Present Posted as Head Assistant Teacher, Up - Graded Middle School Wakarchak, District Lakhisarai .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikas Kumar, AC to AG =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-11-2016 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

The circumstances under which Annexure- 10 had to be issued are valid cogent and for administrative reasons. The Incharge headmaster cannot be allowed to be left in lurch by abandoning the project which she already had in hands for which advances has already been paid and accounting will be required to be done by the said teacher.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17023 of 2016 dt.29-11-2016 2/2 The impugned order contained in Annexure- 10, dated 26.9.2016 to that extent is not required to be interfered with. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 29.11.2016 Transmission Date NA