Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5222 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-852 Year-2019 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== AKHILESH KUMAR @ AKHILESH SAHNI SON OF NAGENDRA SAHNI@NARENDRA SAHNI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PRATAP TAND,P.S-BHAGWANPUR,DISTRICT-VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 28-06-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kudhni P.S. Case No. 852 of 2019 registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the F.I.R., it is stated by the informant that six accused persons came on two motorcycles and called Akhilesh Kumar. On his reaching near the accused persons, they took him into their custody, took him to the office and started asking for money and mobile phone. They dispossessed him of his mobile phone, a total of Rs.75,000/- and destroyed the CCTV monitor etc.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5222 of 2021(4) dt.28-06-2021 2/2 that the F.I.R. was registered against six unknown persons. The name of the petitioner transpired in course of investigation when secret information was received about the involvement of three accused persons including the petitioner herein. It is submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has not been put on T.I. parade inspite of being in custody since 2.7.2020. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession and he has not been put on T.I. parade in spite of being in custody since 2.7.2020, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Kudhni P.S. Case No. 852 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Muzaffarpur.

Prakash/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T