Ranjay Kumar @ Ranjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5657 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2020 Thana- GOVT. OFFICIAL COMPLAINT CASE District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== RANJAY KUMAR @ RANJAY YADAV Son of Masudan Yadav Resident of Village- Dayalibigha, P.S.- Barbigha, District- Sheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 215.64 litres foreign liquor from the joint house of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the illegal liquor was recovered from the joint house of the petitioner and he has no concern with the recovered liquor. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 04.11.2020.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5657 of 2021(2) dt.12-04-2021 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Excise Case No.260/2020, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T