← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52850/2025disposed

Rahul Kumar @ Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-12Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52850 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Rahul Kumar @ Manish Kumar S/O Motilal Singh Resident of VillageHasanpur English@ Sahanpur English, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 221/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2),115(2),117(2),109, of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner along with other co-accused Munna Kumar have assaulted the informant and his son, as a result of which, they sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52850 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3 submitted that informant's son, the petitioner and others were playing football in the nearby filed and in course of playing, informant's son fell down and thereafter, both the parties entered into free fight, causing injury to each-other. Similarly situated co-accused Munna Kumar has already been granted bail by the learned District Court itself.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and the material collected in course of investigating, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad( Bihar) / Concerned Court in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 221/2025 , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52850 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T