Patna High CourtCWJC/10970/2016disposed

Shankar Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-17Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10970 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Shankar Sah, Son of Sukhari Sah, Resident of village- Barahi, Hariram, PostDumari Khurd, P.S- Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi.

2. Kameshwar Sah, son of Mitan Sah, Resident of Village + Post- Dumari Khurd, P.S> Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi.

3. Lalbabu Ram, son of Late Sukhdeo Ram, Resident of Village- Laldasi, PostBasbitta, P.S. Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi.

4. Anirudh Prasad, son of Late Ramji Prasad, Resident of Village + Post- Dumari Khurd, P.S Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi.

5. Ram Lochan Mahto Son of Sukhlal Mahto, Resident of Village- Laldasi, PostBasbita, P.S. Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi.

6. Hari Narayan Singh son of Rajendra Singh, Resident of Village- Majkothwa, P.S. Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi.

7. Dilip Kumar Patel, son of Late Ramchandra Rai, Resident of Village- Hanuman Nagar, Post- Pachharwa, P.S. Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director Mass Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Bihar, Patna.

6. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

7. The District Education Officer, Sitamarhi. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to GA 4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

These petitioners are supposed to have worked on the post of Instructor under the erstwhile Department of Adult and Nonformal Education. Their demand for regularization etc. led to many a litigations. We are concerned with an order passed in a batch of writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.10970 of 2016 dt.17-08-2016 2/2 applications, decided on 21.4.2011, contained in Annexure- 3, the affirmation of the said decision by a Division Bench in LPA No.1489 of 2011, and the order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP moved against the order of the Division Bench. The Court expresses no opinion on the merit of the claim of the petitioners, except that the State will consider their claim within the parameters of the decision rendered in Annexure- 3 as well as LPA No.1489 of 2011. Writ application stands disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 17.8.2016 Transmission Date