Babbu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59101 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2019 Thana- BARURAJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== BABBU KUMAR YADAV Son of Deva Yadav Resident of Village- Naya Tola, Jurabganj, P.S.- Kodha, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shashank Shekhar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajiv Nayan, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) 05-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392,411,414, of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25-1-b,26,35 of the Arms Act. Earlier also, petitioner had moved this Court for grant of regular bail which was rejected vide Annexue 1. Informant has alleged in her fardebyan that on 25.10.2019, she withdrew Rs.49,000/- from Bank for purchase of ornaments for her daughter on eve of Dhanteras and after making purchase, she was returning home on tempo, four miscreants armed with pistol boarded on two motorcycles came and snatched her bag containing Rs.51,000/- PAN card,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59101 of 2021(3) dt.05-01-2022 2/2 AADHAR card and pass book. Later on they were apprehended by the police and looted articles were recovered from them. A report was called for with regard to the present stage of trial and time likely to be consumed in concluding the trial. Report of the trial court has come which is marked as "Flag R2" wherein it has been stated that cognizance has been taken against four accused persons and within six months, trial is likely to be concluded.
In such view of the matter as well as in view of nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby dismissed. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T