← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46437/2019bail granted

Pappu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46437 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-619 Year-2018 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

PAPPU RAI Son of Suresh Rai Resident of Village - Haldi Chhapra, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna 2.

Prithivi Rai Son of Kesho Rai Resident of Village - Haldi Chhapra, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna 3.

Bharat Rai Son of Late Ramjivan Rai Resident of Village - Haldi Chhapra, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna 4.

Ravindra Rai Son of Late Babulal Rai Resident of Village - Haldi Chhapra, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subodh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Maner P.S. Case No. 619 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation as per F.I.R. is that there is dispute between the father - in-law of the informant and one Suresh Rai and on the date of occurrence petitioners along with others came variously armed and started assaulting the father-in-law of the informant and other family members, causing injuries to them and specific allegation against Suresh Rai that he assaulted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46437 of 2019(2) dt.26-07-2019 2/2 Mahesh Rai by means of garasa on his head and co-accused Guddu Rai fired causing injuries to Sheo Janam Rai and further, there is allegation all accused persons that they entered inside the house and looted away the articles.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is case and counter case between the parties and the F.I.R. itself shows that no specific allegation has been attributed to these petitioners.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 619 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T