Hareram Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56035 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2024 Thana- Dehri Mufassil District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Hareram Ram 2.

Bishram Ram 3.

Jairam Ram @ Om Prakash Ram All Sons Of Late Lakshuman Ram 4.

Jai Prakash Ram Son Of Jairam Ram 5.

Manu Ram @ Monu Ram Son Of Hareram Ram 6.

Kapil Ram Son Of Late Mukhdev Ram 7.

Amit Ram Son Of Bishram Ram All Are Resident Of Village -Sakhara Ps- Dehri Muffasil Dist -Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Bihar 2.

Briz Raj Kumar @ Briz Raj Ram Son Of Late Kameshwar Ram Village -sakhara Ps- Dehri (muffasil), Dist -rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.1, Hareram Ram.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn as against petitioner no.1.

4. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56035 of 2024(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/3 Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 427, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC in connection with Dehri (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.30 of 2024.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners next submit that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the accused persons including the petitioners assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on head.

6. It is next submitted that from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that the injuries suffered by the informant is simple in nature. It is thus submitted that had so many accused assaulted the informant in the manner as is being alleged in the FIR, then informant would have suffered grievous injuries.

7. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Dehri,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56035 of 2024(2) dt.06-08-2024 3/3 Rohtas in connection with Dehri (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.30 of 2024., subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

9. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T