← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12191/2024dismissed

Chandra Kant Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-09Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy,The Chief Justice-2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12191 of 2024 ====================================================== Chandra Kant Singh Son of Late Baleshwar Singh, resident of MohallaSarvodaya Nagar, Begusarai, Police Station- Begusarai in the district of Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Begusarai. 5.

The Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Begusarai. 6.

The Executive Engineer , Public Works Department, Begusarai. 7.

The Assistant Engineer, Nagar Nigam, Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. P. K. Shahi, Advocate General For Municipal Corporation :

Mr. Ravi Bhushan Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 09-09-2024 The petitioner has filed the above writ petition as a public interest litigation praying for restraining the respondents from increasing the height of the road known as Gayatri Mandir road proceeding from South of B.P. High School to Pokhar

Patna High Court CWJC No.12191 of 2024 dt.09-09-2024 2/2 connecting Kali Mandir and then to Matihani Block road.

2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent specifically pointing out that the raising of the level of existing road was necessitated only since it had become very low. The houses situated on the roadside were hence at higher level and there was water logging on the road. Though, the road level has been raised, it has been done in a manner ensuring that rain water does enter the houses of the house owners situated on the road side.

3. Reckoning the contentions taken in the affidavit, we are of the opinion that the public interest litigation need not be kept pending. We close the writ petition as unnecessary.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) sharun/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 11.09.2024 Transmission Date