← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51238/2019bail granted

Satish Raj @ Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51238 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2019 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Satish Raj @ Satish Kumar Son of Tej Narayan Singh, Resident of Village - Mayurwa, P.S.- Sonbarsa, Distt - Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2019 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sitamarhi P.S. Case No.11 of 2019 registered under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

The S.H.O. of Sitamarhi P.S. along with police officials raided the place situated near Kapraul Gumti and arrested four persons, namely, Upendra Singh, Ramesh Kumar Jha, Santosh Kumar and Kamlesh Yadav. They disclosed that Raja son of Baijnath Mahto managed to flee away. The informant further alleged that the apprehended accused disclosed that Satish Raj son of Tej Narayan Singh is the leader of their gang. On search, arms and ammunitions were recovered from possession of the apprehended accused.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51238 of 2019(2) dt.17-08-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not even present at the place of occurrence. On account of some personal grudge, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and it is the first criminal case in which the petitioner has been implicated that too on the basis of disclosure made by the apprehended accused but no tangible evidence is collected. Having considered the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No.11 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Harish/- U T