Suresh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8227 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2019 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Suresh Rai Son of Shiv Lal Rai, resident of village- Terasiya, P.S- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant, Mr. Raj Krishna Jha.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 5 of 2020 arising out of Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 447, 307, 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Earlier the petitioner had moved before this Court for regular bail in Cr. Misc. No. 69505 of 2019 and this Court, vide order dated 27.05.2020, rejected the bail of the petitioner. This Court while rejecting the bail prayer of the petitioner has considered the merit of the case, not satisfied with the submission of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8227 of 2021(2) dt.10-02-2021 2/2 Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected. However, this Court directs the court below to conclude the trial within a period of one year, subject to condition that the petitioner would cooperate in disposal of the case.

It has been informed by the informant that the petitioner has filed discharge petition so it will be treated to be non-cooperation and if the trial is not concluded by the aforesaid period without any hindrance, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T