← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59434/2021bail rejected

Shankar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59434 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-300 Year-2021 Thana- JAKKANPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Shankar Choudhary Son of Late Ganesh Prasad Resident of - Laxmi Market, Rajputana, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhimanyu Deo For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-07-2022 Heard both parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 300 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

Prosecution case in brief is that on the alleged date and time of occurrence, while the informant and his friend were going to Mithapur, on the way, two unknown persons came on Pulsar Bike and fired upon the informant from country made pistol and thereafter, they fled away. Informants suspects that this petitioner was involved in the said case, as prior to this occurrence, this petitioner threatened him of dire consequence. It is submitted that petitioner has been made accused in this case only on suspicion and he has got no concern with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59434 of 2021(2) dt.04-07-2022 2/2 the alleged occurrence and other co-accused in committing such type of offence hence accompanying the other accused person in the alleged occurrence does not arise.

However, counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR and has got three criminal antecedents.

Considering the facts aforesaid and criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner abovenamed on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T