Anil Mistri @ Anil Vishwakarma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48254 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2026 Thana- DOBHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Anil Mistri @ Anil Vishwakarma Son of Ganpati Mistri @ Ganpati Vishwarkarma Resident of Village- Bajaura, P.S. -Dobhi, District -Gaya 2.

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Vishwakarma son of Jairam Mistri @ Jairam Vishwakarma Resident of Village- Bajaura, P.S. -Dobhi, District -Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Kant, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

02. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in connection with Dobhi P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 109(1), 352, 3(5) of BNS.

03. As per prosecution case, over some minor dispute, the petitioners and other co-accused persons started assaulting the son of the informant. When the informant and her husband went for his rescue, they were also assaulted by these persons and they caught hold of the husband of the informant and slit his throat with sharp weapon (Fasuli).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48254 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3

04. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. No occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever taken place. There is general and omnibus allegation against together 8 FIR named accused persons. But there is no injury either on the son of the informant or the informant herself. Even the injuries on the husband of the informant are stated to be simple and superficial. One incised wound on right hand was found apart from one lacerated looking incised wound on front of neck but after CT Scan no significant abnormality in the thorax was found and after X-ray no bony lesion seen. Moreover, the allegation for causing these injuries are against 8 FIR named accused persons. There is no specific allegation against the petitioners. There is land dispute between the parties. The petitioner is having clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 is having antecedent of one case. The petitioners are in custody since 01.04.2026 and charge sheet has been submitted.

05. Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioners.

06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the non-serious nature of injury and also considering the period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48254 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 custody of the petitioners and submission of charge sheet, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist, Sherghati, District - Gaya Ji/concerned Court in connection with Dobhi P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions : (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners.

(ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U T