Patna High CourtL.P.A/2071/2016dismissed

Nunu Prasad Sinha v. General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. And ORS

2017-09-18The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2071 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14094 of 2011 =========================================================== Nunu Prasad Sinha, Son of Rana Khelawan Sinha, Resident of Village- Katghra, P.O. Bnatuara, District Samastipur .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. General Manager Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. at G.I. Ali Yaber Jang, Bandara, (East) Mumbai.

2. Regional Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (marketing Division), Indane Regional Office, Begusarai Post- Barauni Oil Refinery District Begusarai.

3. Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Indane Area Officer Begusarai, P.O. Barauni Oil Refinery Distt Begusarai.

4. Subash Chandra Jha S/o Kushal Kishore Jha R/o Nande Nagar P.O. Nandenagar Distt Samastipur.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain Mr. Ajay Kumar Jain For the Respondent/s Indian Oil Corporation : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha Mr. Amalesh Kumar Verma =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 18-09-2017 Seeking exception to an order dated 29.09.2016 passed by the learned Writ Court in CWJC No. 14094 of 2011 this appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. In the matter of grant of L.P.G. Dealership under the scheme in question petitioner's claim has been rejected and thereafter matter was re-advertised and in the re-advertisement

Patna High Court LPA No.2071 of 2016 dt.18-09-2017 2/2 allotment has been made on 28.11.2011. The learned Writ Court considered all these aspects and found that in the application submitted the petitioner did not correctly disclose the particulars of the land. It was completely left blank by the petitioner and when readvertisement was made, petitioner did not participate. Taking note of all these facts the writ petition has been dismissed and in doing so, we are in our considered view, that the learned Writ Court has not committed any error warranting any consideration.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mrl AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 21.09.2017 Transmission Date N.A.