← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59256/2021bail granted

Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-13Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59256 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2021 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== DINESH SINGH @ DINESH KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE DEEP NARAYAN SINGH R/o village- Jaitipur, P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Narain Mallik, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ritesh Abhishek, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 13-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Lalganj P.S. Case No. 259 of 2021 was instituted under Section 341, 323, 324, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that on 28th of July, 2021, when he was sitting at his Poultry Farm accused persons came there and thereafter it is alleged that this petitioner inflicted 'hasua' blow on the informant, who raise his hand for defence causing injury. The petitioner inflicted another 'hasua' blow which cause cut injury below the shoulder. It was in this circumstances the FIR came to be instituted and the petitioner came into judicial custody since 20th of July, 2021.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59256 of 2021(2) dt.13-04-2022 2/3 Learned Senior counsel, who appears on behalf of the petitioner submits that it was mere scuffle between the two parties for which cases were lodged. There was no intention to kill and/or cause any grievous injury which reflects from the injury report where the doctor has opined that the same to be simple in nature. He further submits that although he has criminal antecedent, already is in jail since 20th of July, 2021 and as such he deserve bail.

Mr. Ritesh Abhishek, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner repeatedly assaulted the informant which shows his bad intention. He also has criminal antecedent and as such he does not deserve bail.

Taking into account that the injuries that has been opined by the doctor to be simple in nature and the petitioner is in jail since 20th of 2021, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM-IX, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 259 of 2021, subject to the following conditions :- (i) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59256 of 2021(2) dt.13-04-2022 3/3 dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of bail by the Trial Court itself;

(ii) he shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

With the aforesaid observation, the bail application is allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/- U T