← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1747/2017disposed

Dr. Rajendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through Dr. Anjani Kumar Sinha, The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2017-11-29Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.1747 of 2017 (3) dt.29-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1747 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15440 of 2016 ====================================================== Dr. Rajendra Prasad, Son of Late Binda Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Ashok Nagar Colony, Ghughari Tand, P.S.- Vishnupad, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Dr. Anjani Kumar Sinha, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Dr. Azad Hind Prasad, the Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Anil Kumar, the Joint Secretary, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. Dr. Binay Kumar Yadav, the Deputy Director, Health Services, Magadh Division, Gaya.

6. Dr. Rajdhari Ranjan, Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D.Yadav, AAG- 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 29-11-2017 Heard the parties.

In view of the statements present at paragraphs 6 and 7 of the show cause wherein it is stated that of the three post of Directorin-Chief, Health Services while two have been filled up, the department is in process of filling up the third post, when read alongside the statement made at paragraph 5 of the show cause whereby the case of the petitioner on the post of Director-in-Chief has been considered and rejected by the reasoned order passed on 6.9.2017, no case for proceeding in contempt remains. The petitioner, if so aggrieved by the order dated 6.9.2017 and if so advised, may seek appropriate remedy by filing an appropriate application before the appropriate forum.

The contempt application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U