← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53478/2024bail granted

Indu Yadav @ Indra Yadav @ Indu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-01Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53478 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Indu Yadav @ Indra Yadav @ Indu Devi S/o Bikau Yadav @ Vikau Yadav R/o Village- Motipur, P.S- Bahera, District- Darbhanga 2.

Sajjan Devi W/o Indra Yadav @ Indu Yadav R/o Village- Motipur, P.SBahera, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 366A, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 17-05-2023 at 7.00 PM, the informant's daughter, aged about 14 years, had gone to ease out, but she did not return to her house. Thereafter, on search, the informant came to know that co-accused Nandan Kumar Yadav had kidnapped his daughter. It is further alleged that these two petitioners assisted co-accused Nandan Kumar Yadav in kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53478 of 2024(3) dt.01-10-2024 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from bare perusal of the F.I.R., it is apparent that specific accusation of kidnapping is against co-accused Nandan Kumar Yadav. These petitioners have been made accused merely because they happen to be parents of co-accused Nandan Kumar Yadav. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate - I, Benipur, District - Darbhanga in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 248 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T