Sunil Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51431 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2025 Thana- TARARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sunil Ram S/o Late Dukhan Ram R/O - vill -Badkagaon.P.S. -Tarari,Distt - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Tarari P.S. Case No. 6 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Earlier vide order dated 22.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16884 of 2025 the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner was rejected.

4. Prosecution case, in short, is that, on 10.01.2025, when the informant had gone to attend the call of nature, it is alleged that the petitioner tried to tease her and pulled her veil. On return, the informant informed her husband about the same.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51431 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 2/3 It is further alleged that when the informant's husband went to the petitioner to confront, the petitioner and other accused persons abused him and also assaulted him on his head.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner mainly submitted that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 12.01.2025 and there is no significant progress in the trial. Learned counsel further submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant's husband on his head. He further contended that the injury sustained by the injured is simple in nature. Learned counsel further submitted that charge sheet has been submitted and charge has also been framed. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature of injury as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51431 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Tarari P.S. Case No. 6 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T