← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15643/2019dismissed

Shyam Dev Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-01Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15643 of 2019 ====================================================== Shyam Dev Prasad Sinha S/o Late Chhatra Dhari Lal Prasad Resident of Mohalla Jamalpur Gogari Kumri Tola, Ward No. 13, P.S.- Gogari, Distt.- Khagariya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Superintending Engineer BUDCO, Town Development and Housing Department, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 3.

The District Magistrate Khagaria 4.

The Executive Engineer, BUDCO, Khagaria 5.

The Executive Magistrate, Nagar Panchayat, Gogari, Jamalpur, Distt.- Khagaria 6.

The Sub Divisional Magistrate Gogari Jamalpur, Khagaria 7.

The Circle Officer Gogari Jamalpur, Khagaria ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Arun Kumar, AC to GP-1 For the BUDCO : Mr. Rabindra Kr. Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This writ application has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to revise the order dated 13.04.2019 issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Gogri whereby he has recalled the letter dated 06.04.2019.

It is the petitioner's grievance that without acquiring his land, the State-Respondents are engaged in construction of drainage. By the impugned letter dated 13.04.2019, it appears

Patna High Court CWJC No.15643 of 2019(2) dt.01-08-2019 2/2 that the Sub-Divisional Officer has allowed construction of drainage in the village but not over the land in respect of which the petitioner is raising this claim.

The impugned letter does not require any interference since the petitioner cannot have any grievance now, as his land is not being used for any purpose, by the State-Respondents. This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Rajesh/- U