Muralidhar Pandey @ Murli Dhar Pandey v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No. 868 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -738 Year- 2005 Thana - Complaint Case District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================== MURALIDHAR PANDEY @ MURLI DHAR PANDEY son of Late Guptnath Pandey Resident of village- Pipariyan, P.S. Mohania, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Umashankar Pandit S/o Dashrath Pandit, R/o Barari, P.S.- Chainpur, Dist.- Kaimur at Bhabua.

.... .... Respondent/s ======================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent/s: Mr. APP.

======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-11-2015 The Petitioner who is the father-in-law of the Opposite Party No. 2 seek revision of the judgment of conviction dated 27.04.2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Kaimur at Bhabhua in Criminal Appeal No. 14 of 2008, by which he has affirmed the judgment dated 13.05.2008 passed by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in Tr. No. 761 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case No. 738 of 2005, by which he has convicted the Petitioner under Section 498A IPC and sentenced him to undergo S.I. for two years and fine of Rs. 2,000/-.

Having gone through the judgment of conviction, I do not find any reason for interference.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.868 of 2015 dt.09-11-2015 However, considering the period of custody and the date of occurrence, the sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by the Petitioner.

With the aforesaid observations, the Application stands dismissed.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T