Amit Kumar @ Amit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51652 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-440 Year-2023 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Amit Yadav Son Of Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar Singh Resident Of Village - Lahrabad, P.S. - Piro, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md Ataul Haque For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Piro PS Case 440 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of 10 cases and is in custody since 3-22024 and is not alleged to have fired as specific allegation of firing is against Dhiraj. It is further submitted that co-accused Deepak has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by an order dated 28-3-2024 in Cr. Misc No. 17598 of 2020, further Abhishek Kumar has also been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by order an order dated 14-3-2024 in Cr. Misc

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51652 of 2024(2) dt.25-10-2024 2/2 No. 16435 of 2024.

4.

The learned APP, Shri. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, vehemently opposes the regular bail application of the petitioner and submits that though petitioner is not alleged to have fired but then he was present at the place of occurrence and he has antecedent of 10 criminal cases of serious nature, as such, if bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner may abscond. 5.

Considering the submission made by learned APP, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 6.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T