Ram Sundar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15714 of 2016 =========================================================== Ram Sundar Pandit, Son of Late Kishan Pandit, Resident of Village - Bakaur, P.S. + District - Supaul.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Supaul.
3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Supaul.
4. The Circle Officer, Supaul.
5. The Circle Inspector, Supaul.
6. The Superintendent of Police, Supaul.
7. The Officer-in-Charge, Supaul Police Station, District - Supaul.
8. Kaleshwar Paswan, Son of Late Jitan Paswan
9. Rajendra Paswan, Son of Late Jitan Paswan, Both are resident of Village - Bakaur, P.S. + District - Supaul.
.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the State : MD. Naseem Mukhtar, A.C. to AAG12 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 03-10-2016 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Md. Naseem Mukhtar, learned Assistant Counsel to learned Additional Advocate General No.12, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15714 of 2016 dt.03-10-2016 2/3 The grievance of the writ petitioner, made in this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, relates to removal of encroachment from survey Plot No. 1424, Village Bakur, Kumhar Tola, Thana- Supaul, District - Supaul, which is used as Aam Rasta (Village Road). Having regard to the facts pleaded in this writ petition, the materials on record and, having heard learned counsel for both the parties, we find that the subject matter of this writ petition is fully covered by the observations made, and the directions given, by us in the order, dated 24.11.2015, passed in C.W.J.C. No.4309 of 2015 (Sanjay Jha Vs. The State of Bihar and Others), reported in 2016(1) PLJR 248.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, it is hereby directed that respondent No.2, namely, the Collector, Supaul, shall act, in the present matter, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made and the directions given in the order, dated 24.11.2015, aforementioned.
The petitioner may furnish to respondent No.2, namely, District Magistrate, Supaul, a copy of this writ petition along with annexures thereto and also a certified copy of this order. In view of the above, this writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15714 of 2016 dt.03-10-2016 3/3 Let a copy of this order be sent by FAX to the Collector, Supaul.
(I. A. Ansari, CJ) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/-/ Sanjay AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 06.10.2016 Transmission Date NA