← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12844/2022disposed

Shivnandan Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-08The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12844 of 2022 ====================================================== Shivnandan Mandal Son of Yogendra Mandal Resident of Hakpara, Near Buddha Public School, Ward No. 01, Police Station-Saharsa, District-Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Building Construction Department, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Engineer in Chief, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Saharsa.

5.

The Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Saharsa.

6.

The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Saharsa.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Kumar Singh, S.C. 20) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 08-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- That this application is being filed for issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions with regard to directing the respondents to make the full and final payment to the petitioner in connection with agreement no. 75 F2/2021-22 entered into between the petitioner and the respondent no. 6."

After the matter was heard for some time, finding the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12844 of 2022 dt.08-09-2022 2/2 Court not in favour of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner will be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and to take recourse to such other alternate remedies which are equally efficacious in law. Prayer allowed.

It stands clarified that all issues of fact and law are left open to be agitated before the competent authority. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veenaAFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date