Sri Brij Kishore Singh @ Brij Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52831 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2019 Thana- BHORE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

SRI BRIJ KISHORE SINGH @ BRIJ KISHORE SINGH Son of Ramdeo Singh Resident of Village - Bhore, P.S.- Bhore, Distt - Gopalganj. 2.

Raju Singh @ Raju Kumar Singh Son of Late Vidya Singh Resident of Village - Bhore, P.S.- Bhore, Distt - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State as also the learned counsel for the informant.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No.205 of 2019 registered under Sections 302, 404 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj.

The accusation is that on 13.06.2019, the informant Harinarayan Singh and his younger brother Ramashray Singh were present at the Petrol-Pump, where the construction work was going on. In the meantime, six persons, named in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52831 of 2019(2) dt.23-08-2019 2/2 F.I.R., including the petitioners came there and made indiscriminate firing, due to which Ramashray Singh, the younger brother of the informant, sustained firearm injury and died on the spot. The informant further claimed that the alleged occurrence took place in collusion with Raghvendra Singh, Prabhunath Singh and Awadhesh Gond.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T