Syed Asim Ahmad v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.583 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8066 of 2020 ====================================================== Syed Asim Ahmad S/o Syed Hesamuddin, Resident of Flat No. 302, Nisa Apartment, Near Dadiji Mandir, Bank Road, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District - Patna - 800001.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi- 110001. 2.

The Chairman, Central Administrative Tribunal, 61/35 Copernicus Marg, New Delhi- 110001.

3.

The Principal Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, 61/35 Copernicus Marg, New Delhi- 110001.

4.

The Deputy Registrar (E), Central Administrative Tribunal, 61/35 Copernicus Marg, New Delhi- 110001.

5.

The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Niyojan Bhawan D- Block 1st to 4th Floor, Income Tax Circle, Bailey Road, Patna - 800001.

6.

The Head of Office Private Secretary/Section Officer, Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Niyojan Bhawan D Block 1st to 4th Floor, Income Tax Circle, Bailey Road, Patna - 800001. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Dr. Krishna Nandan Singh (ASG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 30-11-2021 After some arguments, the learned counsel submits that he be allowed to withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. We have found that the appellant was engaged only on contractual basis. His contract was extended from time to

Patna High Court L.P.A No.583 of 2021(2) dt.30-11-2021 2/2 time, that does not mean that his services were ever regularized or he was initially engaged as a regular employee. Faced with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not wish to press the present Letters Patent Appeal.

We permit him to do so.

The Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajan Gupta, J) ( Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U