Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No. 820 of 2015 =================================================== Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Yadav Son of Shree Umesh Yadav, Resident of Village- Abidbigha, P.S.- Pakribarawan, Dist.- Nawada under the Guardianship of his mother namely Sarbila Devi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudish Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s: Mr. Choubey Jawahar (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.

26.11.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

This revision application has been filed for setting aside the judgment and order dated 28.08.2015 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Nawada in Cr. Appeal (Juvenile) No. 19 of 2015, by which he has affirmed the order dated 10.06.2015 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Nawada in G.R. No. 989 of 2015 arising out of Pakaribarawan P.S. Case No. 64 of 2015, by which he has refused to release the Petitioner.

Considering the genesis of the occurrence and the fair antecedents of the Petitioner, let him be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Nawada in G.R. No. 989 of 2015 arising

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.820 of 2015 (2) dt.26-11-2015 out of Pakaribarawan P.S. Case No. 64 of 2015 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail.

(iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Accordingly, the revision application is allowed and the judgment and order dated 28.08.2015 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Nawada in Cr. Appeal

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.820 of 2015 (2) dt.26-11-2015 (Juvenile) No. 19 of 2015, by which he has affirmed the order dated 10.06.2015 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Nawada in G.R. No. 989 of 2015 arising out of Pakaribarawan P.S. Case No. 64 of 2015 is, hereby, set aside.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T