← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17808/2021disposed

Sarita Sharma v. The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

2022-03-11Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah,Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17808 of 2021 ====================================================== Sarita Sharma Wife of Sri Sanjay Kumar Sharma, resident of Village Shitalpur Kanana, Parshotimpur, P.S.-Jokiyari, Raxsoul, District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited represented through the General Manager, Lok Nayak Jay Prakash Bhawan, 6th Floor, Dak Bunglaw Chowk, Patna-1.

2.

The Chief Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Lok Nayak Jay Prakash Bhawan, 6th Floor, Dak Bunglaw Chowk, Patna-1. 3.

The Senior Regional Manager (Retail), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Begusarai Retail Regioanl Office, Raghunath Palace, Har Har Mahadeo Chowk, N.H.-31, District Begusarai.

4.

Head of Regional Office, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Begusarai Retail Regioanl Office, Raghunath Palace, Har Har Mahadeo Chowk, N.H.-31, District Begusarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Avinash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Neeraj Kumar Gupta, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 11-03-2022 The grievance of the petitioner is regarding allotment of retail outlet. Admittedly, the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Begusarai (hereinafter referred to as "the Corporation") has already written a letter to the petitioner to raise his grievances by way of representation, which the petitioner has raised, however no decision has been taken thereon.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17808 of 2021(2) dt.11-03-2022 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a direction is given to the concerned respondent to dispose off the said representation at the earliest.

We thus dispose off the writ petition with a direction to the respondent Corporation to take a decision on the representation by way of speaking order, within a period of 06 weeks from today.

It is needless to state that if the Corporation requires any more information/ documents from the petitioner, it shall be at liberty to seek the same.

(Rajan Gupta, J) ( Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U