← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2679/2014withdrawn

Putul Rani v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-24Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2679 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5234 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Putul Rani Wife of Sri Binod Kumar Sinha Resident of-Flat No.403, Praroop Ravi Shankar Apartment, Ashok Puri, Khajpura, P.O.-B.V. College, P.S.-Airport, Town AND District-Patna-800014 (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Deepak Kumar, Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Department of Personnel Administration, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

4. Sri R.K.Mahajan, Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. Sri H.R. Srinivasa, Director, Higher Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.

6. Sri Rameshwar Singh, Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7. Sri Subodh Kumar, Treasury Officer, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariate, Bailey Road, Patna.

8. Sri Niraj Kumar, Accountant General, Government of Bihar, Mahalekhakar Bhawan, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Munna Pd Dixit (M.P. Dixit) For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aag6- Anjani Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-09-2015 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the present case, counsel for the petitioner submit that in pursuance of direction of this Court in CWJC No. 5234 of 2012, the authorities have passed order against the petitioner. In such view of the matter, counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the order

Patna High Court MJC No.2679 of 2014 (3) dt.24-09-2015 2/2 passed against the petitioner.

In such view of the matter, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order, if any, passed against her.

Jay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U