← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50787/2023bail rejected

Md. Kalim v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50787 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2023 Thana- TARAPUR District- Munger ====================================================== MD. KALIM SON OF MD. SHAMSHEER RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - CHUTIYA, POLICE STATION - SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTRICT - BANKA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nirmala Kumari , Addl. Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 376, 504, 506/34 of I.P.C.

3. Allegation against this petitioner is that he made physical relation with informant on pretext of marriage and took her nude photos and also threatened informant to make her obscene video viral on social media.

4. It is submitted that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the prosecution . The family members of the petitioner denied the marriage of the petitioner with the informant, hence, informant and her family members falsely implicated the petitioner in this false and fabricated case. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50787 of 2023(2) dt.17-08-2023 2/2

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that from bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is clear that the allegation against the petitioner of making physical relation with the informant on pretext of marriage and also threatened to make viral the video of the informant. The informant in her re-statement in para 4 of the case diary has fully supported the prosecution case.

6. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation, prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Kaushik/- U T