Lalji Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Additional Secretary-Cum-Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2308 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4 of 2025 ====================================================== Lalji Prasad Son of Late Kasturi Lal, Resident of Mohalla- Ramna Road, P.SCivil Lines, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Additional Secretary-cum-Principal Secretary, Urban Development an Housing Department, Bihar, Patna. 2.

Additional Chief Secretary-cum-Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

Joint Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

5.

The District Magistrate, Gaya.

6.

The Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya, through its Municipal Commissioner, Gaya.

7.

The Municipal Commissioner, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya. 8.

The Account Officer, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya. 9.

The DGP, Vigilance, Bihar, Patna.

10.

M/s Magadh Tuwell Engineering Works, through its Proprietor Rajendra Prasad, Son of not Known Resident of C/o Magadh Cold Storage, Kujapi, P.S- Chandauti, District- Gaya.

11.

M/s Prakash Traders, through its Proprietor Jai Prakash Sinha Son of not known Resident of Mohalla- Ghugritand, P.S- Vishnupad, District- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priya Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel 28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2026 The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing CWJC No. 4 of 2025, which has stood dismissed on account of non-prosecution, by an order dated 15.1.2025.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court MJC No.2308 of 2025(4) dt.03-04-2026 2/2 the counsel for the petitioner had fallen ill suddenly and therefore, he could not attend the hearing of the case, when the case was called out for hearing on 15.1.2025, thus, a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition petition be restored to its original file.

3.

Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and proper to restore the aforesaid writ petition bearing CWJC No. 4 of 2025 to its original file.

4.

The present restoration petition stands allowed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U