Triloki Bind v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49175 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2015 Thana -KUDRA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Triloki Bind S/o Sudarshan Bind Resident of village - Bharigawa, P.S. Kudra, District - Kaimur at Bhabua .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 209/2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 376 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, the petitioner attempted to commit rape with the informant and in that process he assaulted the informant and further pressed her neck but due to assemblance of nearby person he fled away.
Submission is of false implication, the informant and the petitioner are next door neighbours, as a matter of fact Rs. 7,500/- was due of the petitioner and when the petitioner tried to realize his money this false case has been lodged, now good sense
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49175 of 2015 (3) dt.30-01-2016 2/2 has prevailed and the informant has filed compromise petition also and as such the petitioner who is suffering in custody since 11.07.2015 deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned A.P.P. fairly submits that considering the detention of the petitioner lenient view can be taken. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 209/2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rakhi U T