Patna High Court/4943/2021bail granted

Dinesh Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2021-03-25Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4943 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2020 Thana- KODERMA RPF/POST District- Gaya ====================================================== Dinesh Manjhi aged about 22 years Son Of Parmeshwar Manjhi R/O VillageBaskatwa, P.S.-FATEHPUR, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 3 RP(UP) Act. As per the prosecution case, 32 bags of wheat belonging to Punjab Government was stolen from goods wagon between Bandhua and Tankuppa railway station. Police arrested the petitioner and 3⁄4 other accused persons carrying the said stolen wheat.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on suspicion. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4943 of 2021(2) dt.25-03-2021 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 26.9.2020.

Considering the period of custody and the fact that the petitioner has claimed clean antecedent, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya in RPF(Koderma) Police Station Case No. 10 of 2020 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T