Neeraj Kumar Chaudhary @ Neeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59086 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2021 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Neeraj Kumar Chaudhary @ Neeraj Kumar Son of Shri M. Kumar Chaudhary Address Post Kharaunadiah, P.S. Kudhani (Turki O.P.) O.P., Dist. Muzaffarpur (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shishir Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a supplementary affidavit in which it is stated that the name of father of the petitioner is Ram Kumar Chaudhary, but inadvertently in the cause title of anticipatory bail application, the name of father of the petitioner is typed as Shri M. Kumar Chaudhary.

In view of the fact aforesaid, let the name of father of the petitioner in the cause title of this anticipatory bail application be read as Ram Kumar Chaudhary in place of Shri M. Kumar Chaudhary.

Let the name of father of the petitioner be also corrected in the cause title of this anticipatory bail application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59086 of 2021(4) dt.13-07-2022 2/3 APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kudhani P.S. Case No.412 of 2021 (wrongly mentioned as Kudhani P.S. Case No.415 of 2021 in the prayer portion of this anticipatory bail application), registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant by means of sword causing injuries in his hand. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides sustained injuries. It is submitted that from perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that the injury is lacerated wound on hand. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application.

The learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59086 of 2021(4) dt.13-07-2022 3/3 from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kudhani P.S. Case No.412 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T