← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61075/2021bail granted

Tribhuvan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-09Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61075 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2021 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== TRIBHUVAN YADAV Son of Surat Lal Yadav Resident of Village - Giripatti Ward No.8, P.S.- Raghopur, Distt.- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, it is stated by the informant that seeing the photographs of the three dead bodes on the whatsapp of his mobile phone, which included that of his father, it is stated that they proceeded towards the hospital. The bodies were brought for postmortem examination. The informant states that he suspects the hand of unknown accused persons in the commission of the crime.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR was registered against unknown. The name of the petitioner transpired in course of investigation in an alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61075 of 2021(3) dt.09-05-2022 2/2 confessional statement of the petitioner made before police which has no value. There are no eye witness to the occurrence nor any incriminating material which has transpired in course of the investigation to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime. The petitioner is in custody since 6.4.2021 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

Heard learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the material that has transpired in course of investigation, there being no eye witness to the occurrence and the petitioner having remained in custody for more than 1 year, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case no. 98 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Supaul. (Partha Sarthy, J) Spd/- U