Anand Prakash Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Home Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1726 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Anand Prakash Kushwaha Son of Late Brahamdeo Narayan Resident of Mohalla - Pankha Toli, P.S.- Kazi Mohamadpur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The Inspector General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur. Bihar 5.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur. 6.

The Officer-In-charge, Kazi Mohamadpur Police Station, District Muzaffarpur.

7.

Ajit Kumar Gaur Son of late Satyadeo Prasad Gaur (Pradhan), Arya Kumar Sabha, Muzaffarpur, Resident of Mohalla- Pankha Toli, P.S.- Kazi mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

8.

Dr. Mahesh Chandra Prasad S/O Baidhnath Prasad R/O Moh- Aghoria Bazar, Aamgola, P.S.- Kazi Mohamadpur, Dist.- Muzaffarpur 9.

Rajesh Kumar Son of Gurudeo Singh Resident of Amgola, P.S.- Kazi Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kripanand Jha. Advocate For the State :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Ambastha, S.C.26 Mr. Divit Vinod, AC To SC-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent authorities are not acting upon the representations of the petitioner and illegal construction is being

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1726 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2 made by the private respondents.

3. The petitioner is directed to approach the S.D.M., Muzaffarpur and if such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and appropriate interim/ final order shall be passed by S.D.M., Muzaffarpur within 15 days of the filing of the application, in accordance with law, considering the facts of the case.

4. This application is disposed of.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T