← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10945/2017disposed

Mahendra Thakur And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-17Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10945 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Mahendra Thakur, son of Late Jageshwar Thakur, Resident of VillageMangrauni, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani.

2. Sudhir Thakur, son of Late Kailash Thakur, Resident of Village- Jalwar, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Public Health & Engineering Department, Vishwasaraiya Bhawan, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Public Health & Engineering Department, Vishwasaraiya Bhawan, Patna.

3. The Chief Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health & Engineering Department, Vishwasaraiya Bhawan, Patna.

4. The Superintending Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health & Engineering Circle, Muzaffarpur.

5. The Executive Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health & Engineering Division, Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Kant Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal-Sc4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 17-04-2018 Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case they are granted a liberty to file representation before the respondent no.3 and the respondent no.3 may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a specified time frame. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioners shall file a consolidated representation before the respondent no.3 regarding their grievances raised in the writ petition within a

Patna High Court CWJC No.10945 of 2017 (2) dt.17-04-2018 2/2 period of two weeks from today and the respondent no.3 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter, considering the fact that similarly situated person has already been granted the benefits of ACP/MACP as well as considering the judgment dated 02.02.2011 passed by this Court in CWJC No.7178 of 2010.

The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U