Patna High CourtCWJC/12178/2014disposed

Sharwan Kumar Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-23Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12178 of 2014 =========================================================== Sharwan Kumar Bhagat Son of Sri Parmeshwar Bhagat, Resident of Village and P.O.- Tamua Charne, Police Station- Chatapur, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Industry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Regional Director, Punjab National Bank, R-Block, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Supaul.

5. Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank Charne Branch, P.S.- Chhatapur, District- Supaul.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Ravi Shankar, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Manisha Singh, A.C. to G.P. 7 For the PNB :

Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the Punjab National Bank.

The petitioner had moved the Court seeking a direction to the Punjab National Bank to sanction him loan under the Prime Minister Rozgar Yojana.

From the materials which have come on record, in view of there being numerous findings against the conduct of the petitioner, as also an unliquidated loan only against his father, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, the decision of Punjab National Bank not to sanction the loan to the petitioner, in the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12178 of 2014 dt.23-02-2017 2/2 considered opinion of this Court, is not required to be interfered with. However, as has been submitted by learned counsel for the Punjab National Bank, that the loan is considered on a year to year basis, if in future the petitioner applies afresh, the same shall be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. The writ petition stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Anand Kr.

AFR/NAFR U